righting wrongs or peace?
If you're given a choice between establishing peace and between righting an ancient wrong, which would you go for?
It's a tough question. The great philosophers (Yggie et al) have probably written about it and solved this conundrum. Spatchcock claims my "you're talking about the elimination of Israel like it's a bad thing" is counterproductive or just plain wrong.
Let's be clear here, what I said is just hypothetical. I really want to see world peace. The very concept of war is hateful to me, as a progressive. If there's one thing I hate (other than FOX news, people who release co2 gasses into our atmosphere like there's no tomorrow, which there won't be if they go on, fat girls, frat guys, american corporate culture, gosh just don't get me started) it's people who think violence is the answer to anything. And that's why I heartily support the palestinians. It's one of my special pet causes and defining characteristics.
Having said which, there'd be a lot of plusses to israel being wiped of the map by islamic nations. Just saying.
I'm not explicitly saying it's better to right an ancient wrong than to have peace.
I'm peace all the way.
In this case tho', you Can have the cake and eat it. The peace process (on palestinian terms, I know of no others which count) would also lead to israel's being wiped off the map, negotiations (forever and ever amen) with iran will lead to their having the bomb. Promoting peace doesn't mean having to choose between peace and between what is right.
That's for those who prefer righting wrongs over peace.
If you prefer peace, reject the absurd argument that iran will build a bomb or that the palestinians want to demolish israel. You already know that negotiations and capitulations are the only way forward and they actually get results, unlike war, which besides being very wrong, never achieves anything. We know (from movies, mostly) that built into the very fabric of violence is a mysterious, as yet not fully understood process that undermines any possible chance of its achieving anything.
Violence begets violence, whereas negotiations tend to breed further negotiations. Just think of childhood instances of say, bullying you underwent (or handed out). Or of muggings. Was that violence or knife really necessary?

















